Posted on Thursday, June 11

B & O News
In November of 2003 CSXT notified its’ labor organizations of a change they were instituting in their Family Medical and Leave Act (FMLA) Policy requiring employees to substitute paid personal leave days and vacation leave for unpaid FMLA leave under various specified conditions.  This change in policy, which the Carrier’s vigorously argued was permitted by FMLA regulations, assaulted the collectively bargained rights and benefits of our members to schedule their own paid personal leave days and vacations; as well as their entitlements to claim supplemental sickness benefits for their own illness on some properties (such as our Rule 100, Section 15, Provident benefits) and legislatively garnered privileges such as Railroad Retirement Board sickness benefits.

Since that time the various labor organizations, working in concert with one another, have defeated the measure in Northern Illinois District Court (December 28, 2005 – see here), in the U.S. Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals (March 2, 2007 – see here), at the U.S. Supreme Court (January 14, 2008 – see here), in arbitration under the Railway Labor Act (December 2, 2008 – see here), and now in the penalty phase of the arbitration (June 1, 2009). 

It is now game, set and match and THE LABOR ORGANIZATIONS HAVE COME OUT ON TOP!  As most of you know, CSXT discontinued this FMLA policy in December 2008 in the face of the arbitration board's initial decision on the merits.  Now, the Carrier’s must pay a penalty day for their indiscretions whenever an employee requested unpaid FMLA leave, but was forced to take paid leave, if the employee filed/progressed a penalty claim on a timely basis for being so forced. 
Throughout this ordeal, this General Committee office has consistently instructed our membership to file penalty claims whenever they were forced to take paid leave for FMLA purposes (for example, see the articles on this website entitled “I Am Still Being Charged PL Days for FMLA Leave – What Happened?” dated April 26, 2007 or "FMLA Penalty Claims" dated March 16th of this year.)  Those that took heed of this advice will soon be rewarded with a penalty day payment for each day of violation.  Hopefully those that didn’t file a penalty claim will take heed of our advice during the next dispute; but their claims for this dispute are now barred by time limits.

This is a GREAT VICTORY for rail labor!  The UTU International’s article on this penalty phase arbitration decision can be found here; and a partial copy of the arbitration decision (which is all the General Committee has at the present time) can be reviewed here.

 



Associated Topics

B & O News


Should you encounter any issues while using this site, please contact the webmaster directly.Site designed and implemented by IT Solutions.
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2006 United Transportation Union.
PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.
Page Generation: 0.15 Seconds